You have a right to gather.

Snapchatting Cheerleader Tests Speech on Social Media

In 2017, 14-year-old Brandi Levy went on Snapchat and directed some colorful language at her school and others when she learned that she had not landed a spot on the varsity cheerleading squad.

After being suspended from the junior varsity squad for violating its code of conduct, she and her parents took the school district to court, arguing it did not have the right to punish her off-campus speech.

Four years later, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that the First Amendment limits public schools’ ability to regulate off-campus speech delivered via social media.

Levy, now 19, talks about the incident and recounts the four-year journey that resulted in a landmark free speech case.

First Five Now is a Freedom Forum conversation that explores topical issues and features current newsmakers who are using the five freedoms of the First Amendment to guide their work.

Related Content

Frank Kameny, wearing a suit and tie, sits as he speaks with a man in a blue shirt. Text overlays the photo, reading

1A in Action: Frank Kameny and the Fight Against Employment Discrimination

We highlight Frank Kameny as part of our 1A in Action series.
Read More
students

Student Speech Cheat Sheet

Learn how the First Amendment protects public school students' expression.
Read More
person holding phone with TikTok open on screen

Why Montana’s TikTok Ban Is Unconstitutional

A TikTok ban likely violates TikTok’s First Amendment rights – and yours.
Read More

Prayers protected: What does the Supreme Court say about prayer in school?