Does a federal law that generally bans automated debt-collection calls to cell phones — unless the call is made to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States — violate the First Amendment?
In times of crisis, many people of faith turn to the “big two Gs” — God and government. Depending on one’s theological beliefs, one or both of these will or may come to their rescue.
“First, three of the five justices of the Supreme Court in office at the same time, shall be of one major political party, and two of said justices shall be of the other major political party.” So reads a part of Article IV, Section 3 of the Delaware Constitution.
New York laws banning internet and social media access for all sex offenders — even those who never used the internet or social media to commit a sex offense — violates the First Amendment, says a new lawsuit filed by five individuals in Jones v. Stanford.
In response to the coronavirus pandemic, the Freedom Forum has postponed or canceled all upcoming in person public events, but we remain focused on educating Americans about their First Amendment rights and the importance of being an informed news consumer.
The U.S. Supreme Court took a drastic step on March 16, postponing its oral arguments scheduled for the next two weeks “in keeping with public health precautions” responding to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Guess what’s back in favor: The recently maligned-by-some institution — the daily White House press briefing.
Can the government constitutionally criminalize the advocacy of violating immigration? That question forms the centerpiece of an interesting case, U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith, recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Public librarians should have the ability and editorial discretion to select books for libraries without the censorial hand of members of the community looking over their shoulders and making decisions about content.