Long arm of high school censors shouldn't reach students' homes
Commentary
By Kenneth A. Paulson
Senior vice president, The Freedom Forum
Executive director, First Amendment Center
04.30.98
For most young people, a classroom is where they first hear about the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately, they learn a different lesson when educators fail to practice what they teach.All too often students are told the First Amendment gives them the right of free expression, but they also see how school administrators try to limit that right.
A recent example involved a 13-year-old boy from McKinney, Texas, who created a Web site that satirically made fun of Chihuahuas. The Web site -- heralding the Chihuahua Haters of the World (CHOW) -- was a put-on.
But it attracted the attention of a chow dog breeder who sent an e-mail to the superintendent of McKinney schools protesting the site. The administrator told the boy to remove the site from the Internet, even though it was created in the boy's home. The young man refused and was suspended for a day.
The incident was a vivid reminder of how school administrators seem to be unaware of the Constitutional rights of the students they supervise.
In Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school administrators can censor a high school newspaper because its primary function is as an educational tool and not as a forum for free expression.
It's quite a leap from Hazelwood to shutting down a Web site. There is no legal justification for censoring a student's expression in the privacy of his home.
Other examples of curtailed student expression:
When social studies and history teachers teach the Bill of Rights in their classrooms, they would do well to ask administrators to sit in. Some lessons bear repeating.
Ken Paulson is executive director of the First Amendment Center with offices in Arlington, Va., and Nashville, Tenn. His mailing address is:
Ken Paulson
First Amendment Center
1207 18th Ave. S
Nashville, TN 37212