Lawyer's criticism of judge is protected speech, Colorado high court rules
By The Associated Press
09.14.00
Printer-friendly page
DENVER — An attorney who accused a Douglas County District Court
judge of being biased and racist is protected by the First Amendment, the
Colorado Supreme Court has ruled.
The Supreme Court said Sept. 11 that the public needs access to the
views of lawyers and ruled that they cannot be punished for criticizing judges
unless they make false statements of fact.
Attorney Lawrence Jamalian Green, who is black, referred to Judge
Scott Lawrence as a "racist" and "bigot" and accused
him of racism in letters to the judge. The state attorney grievance committee
said Green's letters and motions contained "relentless criticism
and contempt for the judge" constituting "a serious breach of
acceptable behavior for an attorney toward a member of the
judiciary."
The grievance committee decided Green should be suspended from the
practice of law for 60 days for charging excessive fees in a civil case and
authoring the letters to Lawrence.
But the Supreme Court said Green's comments were protected
speech. The First Amendment shields a lawyer's statements of opinion, but
not false statements of fact, from attorney discipline, the court ruled.
The justices said Green was simply stating his opinion and
didn't make or imply false statements of fact.
Green made the allegations in letters he sent to Lawrence and to other
lawyers in a Douglas County court case. Green's client won the case at
trial. He sent the letters while Lawrence was trying to determine the fees
Green should be paid.
"I do not believe I can state my case more emphatically than I
already have; I want you off this case. I am entitled to and I affirm my right
not to have my attorney fees determined by a racist judge," Green wrote
in the final letter.
The Supreme Court said it found no indication of bias or prejudice by
Lawrence but noted that it is important that lawyers not be muzzled in their
criticism of judges.
"By clothing Green's letters with the mantle of the First
Amendment, we neither condone the tone of Green's letters nor agree with
the conclusions he drew," the unanimous opinion said.
The justices said restricting attorney speech hinders the
public's access to the views of lawyers, who are in the best position to
comment on the judicial system.
"Interest about judges is important in Colorado, where the
public periodically votes whether to retain judges," the opinion
said.
The court found that Green did charge an unreasonable fee in one step
of the lengthy court process and decided to publicly censure him on Sept. 11,
rather than to suspend him.
Related
Illinois attorney faces suspension for insults
Marvin Gerstein contends his letters labeling opposing attorneys, officials 'idiot' or 'babycakes' are protected speech.
08.15.02
Attorney's free speech went too far, N.D. high court holds
State Supreme Court reprimands Jonathan Garaas for calling one of its rulings dishonest, branding another lawyer a liar.
11.19.02
