FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

FTC to Congress: First Amendment would limit media-violence crackdown

By The Associated Press

11.22.00

Printer-friendly page

WASHINGTON — First Amendment protections significantly restrict the ability of the government to go after entertainment companies that peddle inappropriate music, films and video games to children, federal regulators are telling Congress.

With these constitutional guarantees binding its hands, the Federal Trade Commission says a better solution would be for the entertainment industry to step up self-regulation efforts and for lawmakers to keep a watchful eye.

If entertainment companies fail to stop marketing adult material to children, then Congress should consider narrowly tailored legislative remedies, the commission said.

Vice President Al Gore and his running mate, Joseph Lieberman, have already said they would favor federal action if the industry fails to police itself.

Lawmakers had asked the FTC to examine whether the agency could use its existing authority to take action against movie houses, video game makers and music producers that market inappropriate products to underage audiences. That came after a scathing commission report which found that industry executives aggressively and routinely target adult-rated material at children.

The FTC has jurisdiction to enforce regulations that prohibit "unfair" or "deceptive" marketing. But extending this authority to the marketing practices of the entertainment industry raises "a number of significant legal limitations, including substantial and unsettled constitutional questions," wrote FTC Chairman Robert Pitofsky in a letter to Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz.

For example, to prove deceptive marketing of an R-rated movie under one legal theory, the FTC said it would have to show that advertising or other promotional material indicated the film was appropriate for audiences under age 17. At the same time, the agency said, it would also have to show that the film was in fact not suitable for audiences under age 17.

While many R-rated movies are inappropriate for younger viewers because of violent or graphic content, parents may not have objections to their children seeing certain R-rated films.

"People might have different views about the propriety of unaccompanied children under 17 seeing a film like 'Saving Private Ryan' versus one like 'I Know What You Did Last Summer,' " the commission wrote.

That could put federal regulators in the thorny position of determining which movies are appropriate for young audiences, raising First Amendment concerns, the agency said.

Jack Valenti, head of the Motion Picture Association of America, said the FTC letter clearly illustrates "any attempt to charge the movie industry for deceptive advertising of R-rated films would be fatally infected with serious constitutional problems." The group has implemented voluntary guidelines to curtail the practice of marketing inappropriate R-rated films to children.

Some experts say that deceptive advertising may not be at the root of what parents and federal officials find objectionable about the industry's marketing practices.

"The real objection to some of the marketing directed at children is not that it is untrue or misleading, but that it is too true in inviting children to see movies they might like but which we think are bad for them," said First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams.

He added that the distinction between the marketing of constitutionally protected content and the content itself is not clear-cut.

The commission also said it might also have a hard time demonstrating that a marketing practice of an entertainment company causes substantial injury to consumers and is therefore unfair.

The FTC concluded the industry should bolster its efforts at self-regulation. Entertainment executives have said they are taking steps in this direction already, but some critics, including Lieberman, have argued that the industry is not doing enough.

Previous

Movie executive admits 'lapse' in judgment
Angry senators question Mel Harris, president of Sony, other officials about industry marketing practices during committee hearing today.  09.27.00

Lawmakers blast marketing efforts of entertainment industry
Sen. John McCain leads committee hearing echoing FTC report’s claim that companies ‘routinely’ market violent products to kids.  09.14.00

Roundup: Nebraska Regents candidate challenges campaign-finance law
Other First Amendment news from around the United States.  09.12.00

FTC report: Entertainment industry markets violent material to youth
Releasing results of long-awaited study, commission urges industry to expand voluntary codes, sanction companies that run afoul of guidelines.  09.11.00

Related

Atmosphere ripe for further regulation of broadcast media, say panelists
Participants say federal government is moving toward content, other restrictions on media in effort to control real-world acts of violence.  10.25.00

Book community decries effort to rein in media violence as censorship
However legitimate the concerns are about violence in society, 'the proposed cures are worse than the illness,' says joint statement by seven groups.  11.30.00

Senate committee passes bill to restrict TV violence
Measure would limit violent programs to times when children do not make up large part of viewing audience.  09.21.00

graphic
spacer