FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Congress passes bill expanding penalties for classified leaks

By The Associated Press

10.13.00

Printer-friendly page

WASHINGTON — Congress has voted to expand criminal penalties for government employees leaking secrets in a move critics warn could stifle the ability of whistle-blowers and the media to get information to the public.

But congressional intelligence committee leaders, backed by the Justice Department, said the tough measure was needed to stop the flow of classified information that may undermine national security and jeopardize lives.

Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla., chairman of the House intelligence panel, said the provision, part of a bill to fund intelligence agencies, was "narrowly crafted to protect the rights that all Americans hold dear. It is not, as some will say, an affront to the First Amendment."

Current law makes it a felony to harm national security by leaking classified defense material. The new measure, authored by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., would subject government employees to up to three years in prison for willfully disclosing nearly any classified information.

The House and Senate both passed the intelligence bill by voice yesterday, and President Clinton is expected to sign it. The bill, House Resolution 4392, funds 11 intelligence agencies, including the CIA and the National Security Agency, in fiscal 2001. The total budget is not made public, but it is believed to be about $30 billion.

Attorney General Janet Reno last June endorsed the new criminal penalties as a deterrent to leaking, while acknowledging a "fine line between a free press able to publish and encourage public debate and how we protect the national security."

She said federal prosecutors would not bring charges against news reporters or those who inadvertently reveal classified material.

But Reps. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., a liberal member of the intelligence committee and Bob Barr, R-Ga., a leading conservative, said the provision constituted the nation's first official secrets act. "It would silence whistle-blowers in a way that has never before come before this body," Barr said.

Pelosi said even members of Congress could face felony charges for revealing classified information.

Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said the measure would lead to more journalists being subpoenaed and possibly jailed for not revealing sources, and to a decline in public interest stories written "because somebody in the government had the guts to leak something."

Anders Gyllenhaal, executive editor at The News & Observer of Raleigh, N.C., and chairman of the American Society of Newspaper Editors' freedom-of-information committee, warned that the measure might encourage the government to classify more information. "Do you trust every government official to make a judgment of what is classified? History shows that that is not a good thing."

The provision also caused a jurisdictional dispute between the intelligence committees and the heads of the House Judiciary Committee, who said writing new criminal penalties into law was their responsibility.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, R-Ill., and ranking Democrat John Conyers of Michigan, in a letter to Goss, said "this extension would grant the administration a blank check to criminalize any leaking they do not like."

Conyers said yesterday that the measure would "scare the bejesus out of whistle-blowers" and that past revelations, such as the CIA's support of the 1973 coup in Chile or Nixon's support of Pakistan in its 1971 war with India, would have led to criminal prosecution.

Update

News organizations urge Clinton to veto classified-leaks bill
Critics say proposal would in effect create an 'official secrets act,' warn it could silence whistleblowers, stop media from getting information to the public.  11.02.00

Previous

Reno backs criminal penalties for 'life-threatening' leaks of classified data
But attorney general balks at criminalizing accidental leaks or going after news reporters who receive leaked information.  06.15.00

Related

Plugging a leak by puncturing freedom
Ombudsman In Washington, where information is power, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence proposes to keep secrets by jailing those who talk to the press.  06.16.00

graphic
spacer