FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

House panel strips free-speech restrictions from drug bills

By Phillip Taylor
Special to
The Freedom Forum Online

07.26.00

Printer-friendly page

The House Judiciary Committee yesterday approved revamped versions of bills designed to strengthen penalties against those who deal in methamphetamines and ecstasy, after it removed free-speech restrictions from both measures.

"The Judiciary Committee bravely withstood pressure to expand some of the worst elements of the so-called war on drugs," said Marvin Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

After numerous delays over the past three months, the committee approved a series of amendments to the bill, now called the Methamphetamine and Club Drug Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, before passing the entire measure on a voice vote.

The original Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation Act, sponsored in the Senate by Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and in the House by Chris Cannon, R-Utah, would have banned the publishing of drug-making instructions. The Senate approved the bill last November, saying the legislation would bolster federal and state investigators' abilities to combat the drug.

An original provision of the bill would have made it a felony to "teach, demonstrate or distribute any information pertaining to the manufacture of a controlled substance" such as those classified by the government as Schedule 1 drugs.

Hatch and Cannon said they designed the bill to target the actual production of methamphetamine, a drug easily made with basic laboratory equipment. They warned that the drug could become the next epidemic, noting that law enforcement agents had busted more than 250 such labs last year in Utah alone.

Cannon said the provisions governing online information only would have affected those who had a criminal intent.

But free-speech and drug activists disagreed.

They said the bill, if passed as originally written, would have made it illegal to discuss legal uses of marijuana, such as hemp clothing, and would have outlawed other discussions, including those on medicinal marijuana and medical concerns about other Schedule I drugs.

"The fact that any elected official would even consider the possibility of making it illegal to distribute information under any circumstance is, to me, egregious beyond words," said Mark Greer, executive director of DrugSense. "The fact that it actually got into committee is even more worrisome."

Press officers for Cannon did not return phone calls today.

Amid debate, a second drug bill, the Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act, surfaced in both the Senate and the House. Mostly a carbon copy of the methamphetamine bill, the ecstasy measure also would create a number of new federal drug offenses.

In its actions yesterday, the House Judiciary Committee, with a 15-12 vote, narrowly approved an amendment from Reps. Bob Barr, R-Ga., and Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., to remove the speech elements from the bill. The committee also removed from the bill references to secret searches.

But the ACLU and the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws expressed disappointment that the bill still included a provision that would create new federal drug offenses.

"Despite recent groundbreaking reports showing that minorities are far more likely to be targeted under harsh federal drug laws than whites accused of the same crimes, some members of Congress appear to be saying that no cost is too high when it comes to cultivating a tough-on-crime image," said Rachel King of the ACLU.

Previous

Congress considers another bill forbidding online drug discussions
Free-speech advocates say Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act would chill legitimate speech concerning safety of the drug.  06.26.00

Related

Federal judge: California doctors can recommend marijuana
ACLU's lawsuit contends that federal government's position on revoking prescription licenses violates doctors' free-speech rights.  09.08.00

Marijuana activists denounce proposed ban of drug recipes
Some say parts of Senate anti-methamphetamine bill would stifle legitimate speech about industrial hemp, medicinal marijuana.  01.06.00

graphic
spacer