Campaign-finance law takes effect
By The Associated Press
11.06.02
Printer-friendly page
WASHINGTON As the elections were settled, a law took effect today barring unrestricted donations to the national political parties, intended to end the era of free-spending, big-money politics.
Politicians and interest groups are already looking for loopholes to keep the cash flowing.
Sen. John McCain of Arizona, chief Republican sponsor of the campaign-finance reform law, complained last night that the Federal Election Commission was emasculating the law it was supposed to enforce.
"We're going to take them to court," he said on CNN. "We will fight them again in the Congress if necessary."
The law bans what is called "soft money," unlimited donations from corporations, labor unions and other interests that have become the biggest source of national campaign funds. First Amendment advocates who oppose campaign-finance reform say such measures unconstitutionally restrict political speech.
The national political parties have until Jan. 1 to get rid of any soft money left in their accounts after election day. They can use it to cover debts from the last campaign, or to pay the cost of recounts and runoff elections. Effective today, the parties can raise only limited, "hard money" donations, not to exceed $2,000 from an individual contributor.
The parties want FEC permission to raise additional soft money to cover 2002 recounts. Reformers call that an unacceptable loophole. The commission will consider the question on Nov. 14.
Congressional Democrats provided most of the votes for passage of the reform law, but their national party could be at a disadvantage without soft-money contributions. For the 2002 campaign, the Republicans raised $162 million more than the Democrats in the hard money donations that remain legal.
State political organizations and interest groups can still use soft money.
According to McCain, soft money has poisoned politics. It didn't exist when he first ran for Congress, he said, and "there was no such thing as the obscene amounts of money we are seeing in this campaign, nor was there such a thing as these terrible, terrible, negative ads that continue to inundate people."
In related news, Colorado voters yesterday approved a ballot measure to limit campaign contributions and make public the names of large contributors to so-called education committees.
The proposal, Amendment 27, caps campaign contributions at $200 for legislative candidates and $500 for statewide offices for each primary and general election. Gubernatorial candidates would be limited to spending $2.5 million; state House candidates would be limited to $65,000 and state Senate candidates to $90,000.
Updates
Campaign-finance law heads to court
Meanwhile, Hawaii Right to Life asks federal judge to block enforcement of ad restrictions in the new law.
11.25.02
Campaign-finance law's sponsors to expand challenge to FEC rules
Sen. John McCain criticizes agency's decision to exempt certain charitable, educational and religious organizations from restrictions on political advertising.
11.15.02
Previous
Law's sponsors claim FEC opened 'loopholes' in soft-money ban
Reps. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., and Marty Meehan, D-Mass., file federal lawsuit, saying commissioners misinterpreted law in drafting rules.
10.09.02
Related
Political parties enter new era in campaign funding
Partisan groups are forming to take in 'soft money' that national parties are barred from raising under new law.
11.07.02
Campaign-finance law on fast track to Neverland
By Ken Paulson Drafters of McCain-Feingold must have had a head full of pixie dust when they restricted certain pre-election broadcast ads.
04.21.02