FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Veterans renew call for flag-protection amendment

By The Associated Press

09.28.02

Printer-friendly page

MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. — A group of veterans says that, in the wake of last year's terror attacks, it's time for Congress to pass a constitutional amendment protecting the U.S. flag from desecration.

The flag is a sacred symbol, and "we think it's even more special after 9-11 than ever in the history of the country," said Larry McKay of Mount Pleasant, who served with the Army in Vietnam.

In July 2001, the House of Representatives, for the fourth time in six years, endorsed the proposed amendment that would authorize Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the U.S. flag.

The vote was 298-125. However, the measure has not made it to the Senate floor this session. In 2000, the Senate voted 63-37 for the proposal, but that was four votes short of the two-thirds needed for a constitutional amendment.

South Carolina's two U.S. senators, Strom Thurmond and Ernest "Fritz" Hollings are both World War II veterans and co-sponsors of the amendment in the Senate.

"The American flag is the most respected symbol of our nation," said Thomas Meteraud, commander of the American Legion in the Charleston area. "The remains of our war dead come home to our soil draped in the American flag."

He says it is an affront to the nation's war dead to allow desecration of the flag.

Opponents of the amendment argue it would be a mistake to limit First Amendment rights to ban an act that rarely occurs.

McKay and Dick Walsh, the vice commander of the American Legion in South Carolina, say they don't want to limit free speech and that they have fought to protect it.

"I can go to Washington, D.C., right now and get a can of spray paint and spray paint on the base of the Washington Monument and I'd be arrested for desecrating a national monument," Walsh said. "Yet I can stand on those same steps near the Washington Monument and take that flag I fought for and shed blood for and set it one fire and nothing would happen to me."

Related

Alaska Senate urges Congress to pass flag-protection amendment
Lone vote against resolution cast by Vietnam War veteran who says he is offended by flag burning but is wary of government limits on free speech.  05.01.02

Maine lawmaker proposes repeal of sales tax on U.S. flags
But bill would require flag-burners to return tax savings to the state, mandate that their names be published in newspapers.  02.07.03

Stars, stripes and cell phones: Symbols are secondary in a nation founded on freedom
By Ken Paulson Consider the risk of tampering with the Constitution to prevent a dozen or so people from burning their own U.S. flags each year.  04.07.02

Vermont Legislature passes flag resolution after decade of debate
Measure calls on Congress to take action to protect U.S. flag; state's congressional delegation has opposed constitutional amendment.  01.11.02

House approves flag amendment for fourth time in 6 years
But ACLU, other opponents say vote shows diminished support for efforts to alter Constitution to prevent desecration of national symbol.  07.18.01

The Flag Desecration Amendment (2001)
Information on the debate over flag desecration, political expression and the First Amendment.  03.21.01

graphic
spacer