FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Wisconsin high court won't close arguments in caucus appeals

By The Associated Press

08.20.02

Printer-friendly page

MADISON, Wis. — The state Supreme Court refused yesterday to keep secret the oral arguments for appeals in a secret investigation into allegations of illegal campaigning by state lawmakers and their staffs.

The justices rejected a request from attorneys to keep the Sept. 18 arguments private and briefs filed in the cases under seal.

"We are confident that the counsel for the parties and the interveners can craft and deliver their arguments to this court without disclosing information that might jeopardize the underlying John Doe investigation," the court said.

The nature of the appeals is unknown because the appeals court has kept the cases under seal to preserve the investigation's secrecy.

Dane County District Attorney Brian Blanchard and Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann began the secret investigations after a Wisconsin State Journal series reported last year that employees of the state's legislative caucuses were illegally doing campaign work on state time.

Blanchard and McCann have declined to comment on their investigations.

All three of the appeals are related to rulings by Dane County Judge Sarah O'Brien, who is hearing the secret John Doe proceedings. Such proceedings are used to determine whether a crime was committed and who committed it.

Court records do not identify the individuals appealing, but lawyers' bills released in June confirm that Assembly Majority Leader Steve Foti, R-Oconomowoc, and former legislative aide Sherry Schultz are two of the three appellants.

The state Supreme Court said it would continue to seal any testimony, exhibits and names of witnesses from the John Doe proceedings.

The 4th District Court of Appeals asked the state Supreme Court to hear the cases because it was uncertain whether it had the jurisdiction to rule on the issues involved.

Related

Wisconsin Ethics Board releases caucus documents
Move settles lawsuit filed by two newspapers that sought information on alleged illegal campaigning by legislative caucuses.  08.09.02

Wisconsin legislative clerks agree to release names of staffers
Officials drop plans to fight judge's order to identify state employees who have had their legal bills paid by taxpayers.  05.08.02

Wisconsin Senate clerk refuses to release detailed legal bills
Don Schneider says doing so might reveal confidential information, but watchdog group says taxpayers have right to know where their money is going.  01.12.02

Wisconsin district attorney investigates Republican Caucus over open records
At issue is whether Assembly members deleted computer files, removed campaign records sought by Wisconsin State Journal.  06.04.01

graphic
spacer