FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Band can keep rockin' with 'Barbie Girl'

By The Associated Press,
freedomforum.org staff

07.27.02

Printer-friendly page

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court has declined to reinstate a lawsuit from Mattel Inc. alleging the rock song "Barbie Girl" infringed on the toymaker's doll patent.

On July 24, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a lower court that the song was a parody and refused to allow the lawsuit to proceed.

Mattel sued MCA Records Inc. and others who helped produce and market the song, which includes the phrase, "I'm a blonde bimbo girl in a fantasy world." The maker of Barbie claimed the song by the Danish band Aqua violated Mattel's copyright and that the song confused consumers into thinking Mattel backed the Top 40 composition.

MCA also sued Mattel for defamation while the suit was pending. Mattel, the court wrote, said MCA's alleged trademark violation was a "crime."

The 9th Circuit panel upheld a federal judge’s ruling that threw out the defamation suit and the trademark suit.

Judge Alex Kozinski, writing for the panel in Mattel v. MCA, began the opinion by writing: “If this were a sci-fi melodrama, it might be called Speech-Zilla meets Trademark Kong.”

Later in the opinion he wrote, "The parties are advised to chill."

The appeals court said no one would think Mattel had anything to do with the song.

"Nor, upon hearing Janis Joplin croon 'Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Mercedes-Benz' would we suspect that she and the carmaker had entered into a joint venture,” Kozinski wrote.

"To be sure, MCA used Barbie's name to sell copies of the song… . However . . . the song also lampoons the Barbie image and comments humorously on the cultural values Aqua claims she represents" which is protected expression under the First Amendment.

It was the second blow to Mattel over its Barbie trademark in 18 months.

In February 2001, the 9th Circuit ruled that a Utah artist can continue using Barbie dolls in his photographic renderings, some of which depict dolls posed in sexual positions. In that case, Mattel sought to bar Tom Forsythe from using the doll in his photographs and from selling the photos as postcards.

Update

High court refuses to hear fight over Barbie song parody
Justices turn away appeal by Mattel to reopen trademark fight over Danish group's 1997 dance hit 'Barbie Girl.'  01.27.03

Related

Artist can toy around with Barbie, rules federal judge
Court says Utah man's photographs are parody, don't hurt Mattel's marketing of doll.  08.14.01

Case of the plastic plaintiff: Barbie vs. free speech
By Ken Paulson Despite lighthearted opinion, decision about satirical song was important First Amendment victory.  08.11.02

Federal appeals panel: Artist can continue using Barbie dolls in photos
Toy maker had asked court to grant preliminary injunction in suit accusing artist of copyright, trademark infringement.  02.23.01

graphic
spacer