FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Court hears dispute over another Tennessee commandments display

By The Associated Press

05.07.02

Printer-friendly page

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A federal judge heard two hours of arguments yesterday on whether to order the Ten Commandments removed from the Rutherford County Courthouse.

U.S. District Judge Robert Echols did not rule from the bench nor indicate when he would rule on the request for a preliminary injunction filed by the Tennessee American Civil Liberties Union and several local residents.

Commissioners in Rutherford County, southeast of Nashville, voted in April to post the Ten Commandments along with eight other documents, including the Magna Carta, the Mayflower Compact and the Declaration of Independence.

The county was represented by Erik W. Stanley, an attorney for Liberty Counsel, an Orlando, Fla.-based group that describes itself as a civil liberties advocacy group devoted to preserving religious freedom.

Stanley argued that the Ten Commandments are historical as well as religious.

"This is a historical display intended to convey a historical message," he told Echols. "The message we are sending is that the Ten Commandments and other religious documents have played a role in the foundation of our system of law and government."

Nashville attorney George Barrett argued on behalf of the ACLU that the Ten Commandments are the only religious document in the display and said that constitutes an endorsement of religion in violation of the First Amendment.

"What message do you send if you take all these secular documents and stick one religious document in there?" he said. "That it has the same weight as the others. That is an establishment of religion. It promotes a religion. It is an impermissible intertwining of state and religion."

Stanley argued that a ruling May 3 by U.S. District Judge Allan Edgar in a Chattanooga case should have no bearing on Echols' decision because the Chattanooga displays included the Ten Commandments only. Edgar ordered the display taken down.

Barrett made repeated reference to a Kentucky case handled by Stanley in which what he called "tinkering" — the addition of non-religious documents in an effort to find something the courts would uphold — also failed to pass the court's scrutiny.

"History is replete with the disaster of government supporting one religion over another," Barrett said. "There is nothing more divisive than this. The founders were clearly mindful of that history."

Rutherford County is the latest of several Tennessee counties to post the biblical laws. More than half of the state's 95 counties have approved the displays and more than 30 have posted the Ten Commandments — some decades ago. Washington County in northeast Tennessee has had such a display for more than 80 years.

Tennessee Attorney General Paul Summers issued an opinion last month deeming Ten Commandments displays on government property an unconstitutional promotion of religion.

Echols did not take testimony from either side. He accepted their written legal arguments as well as the tapes from three county commission meetings at which the Ten Commandments were discussed.

Update

Another Tennessee county ordered to remove commandments display
Judge says it was difficult 'to reach any conclusion other than that the sole purpose of erecting the challenged display was for the advancement of a religious purpose.'  06.24.02

Related

County loses fight over Ten Commandments displays
Federal judge orders Tennessee officials to remove plaques from two courthouses, ruling postings violate church-state separation.  05.06.02

Maryland teen questions commandments monument in city park
Student's letter prompts debate over whether Frederick officials should remove stone tablet.  05.16.02

Ohio judge told to remove Ten Commandments poster
Federal court rules James DeWeese's courtroom display is unconstitutional 'because the debate he seeks to foster is inherently religious in character.'  06.13.02

Push for Ten Commandments displays gains momentum in South
Supporters see effort as way of encouraging morality, but civil libertarians view campaign as affront to nation's fundamental principles.  04.12.02

State attorney general calls Ten Commandments displays unconstitutional
Opinion comes amid push to have all 95 Tennessee counties adopt resolutions in favor of posting religious codes in government buildings.  04.05.02

graphic
spacer