FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Street preacher's rants are protected speech, rules Oregon court

By The Associated Press

11.04.01

Printer-friendly page

SALEM, Ore. — Loudly calling people "whoremongers" and "drunkards" in public isn't enough to convict a street preacher of disorderly conduct, the state Court of Appeals has ruled.

The court said Eugene authorities wrongly used a disorderly conduct ordinance to quell the free-speech rights of Daniel Lee, even though he provoked passers-by with inflammatory accusations.

Pounding on his Bible and preaching at the city's downtown mall on April 16, 1999, Lee accused passers-by of various sins. He called one man who stopped to debate him "a drunkard" and made repeated references to "whores." When Lee told a woman who was kissing her fiancé she was a whore and was going to hell, the couple complained to police, who arrested Lee.

Police said as many as 35 people had surrounded Lee and that he was trying to provoke a fight, violating the ordinance's ban on fighting or "violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior." He also was charged with unreasonable noise violations and obstructing pedestrian traffic.

In reversing his conviction, the appeals court said in its Oct. 31 opinion that Lee didn't violate any of the prohibitions. There was no evidence, the court said, that Lee engaged in any physical aggression but that he was arrested because police thought his words would cause others to do so.

Nor did authorities cite anything but the content of Lee's speech in claiming that he had caused a public annoyance due to noise, the court said.

The court said Lee's "religious opinions, although upsetting to some listeners, simply cannot be considered unreasonable noise" under free-speech protections. And the appeals panel said Lee didn't obstruct pedestrians because those who didn't want to stop and listen simply could walk on.

"Street preaching that induces some people in a busy public walkway to stop and listen while others may pass unimpeded is expressive activity that is protected" by the Oregon Constitution, the court said.

Previous

Street preachers sue Oregon city, claiming First Amendment violations
Christian advocates argue that Portland officials have muzzled their speech and religious liberty rights in several public venues.  03.09.00

Related

Street preacher's First Amendment 'sermon' gets him handcuffed
First Amendment Outrage Getting handcuffed for citing your First Amendment freedoms is a bit over the top.  11.01.00

Teen asks S.D. high court to overturn disorderly conduct conviction
Attorney tells justices boy was protected by free speech when he flipped up his middle finger, mouthed profanity at school principal.  03.29.02

graphic
spacer