White House cautions TV networks about airing bin Laden tapes
By The Associated Press,
|White House spokesman Ari Fleischer briefs reporters yesterday about administration's conversations with TV network executives about fears that Osama bin Laden and associates may be using videotaped messages to communicate secretly with each other.
WASHINGTON Suspicious that Osama bin Laden is using American TV to send coded messages, the White House asked the networks yesterday to think twice before airing his terrorist organization's videotaped messages.
"At best, this is a forum for prerecorded, pretaped propaganda inciting people to kill Americans," White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said.
At worst, the broadcasts could contain signals to "sleeper" agents, he added. "The concern here is not allowing terrorists to receive what might be a message from Osama bin Laden calling on them to take any actions."
Following a conference call with National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox agreed they would not broadcast transmissions from bin Laden's al-Qaida group without first screening and possibly editing them.
In a statement that echoed those of its counterparts, Fox News said: "We believe a free press must and can bear responsibility not to be used by those who want to destroy America and endanger the lives of its citizens."
One day earlier, CNN and MSNBC aired unedited a tape of al-Qaida spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith praising the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the United States and warning there would be more. That message, like one from bin Laden just after U.S. military attacks began in Afghanistan on Oct. 7, was picked up from Al-Jazeera television, the only station with correspondents broadcasting from within Afghanistan.
The target of a high-tech global manhunt, bin Laden cannot simply pick up the phone to activate his network, and it is logical to expect he might embed instructions in taped public messages, Fleischer said.
But some press advocates say the administration's request is premature because there is no evidence of hidden messages in the videotapes.
"I would want some indication from intelligence personnel of a reasonably persuasive nature that some signal [from al-Qaida] is discernible, [and] if bin Laden is sending signals to followers, I would question whether four or five networks have the power to stop him," said Bob Zelnick, acting chairman of Boston University's journalism department and a former ABC Pentagon correspondent, as quoted in The Boston Globe.
The New York Times today criticized the administration's request in an editorial and said the White House had also suggested that print media might be asked not to publish complete transcripts of bin Laden's messages.
"This White House effort is ill advised in the absence of clear evidence that coded messages are contained in the videotapes," the editorial said. "Even if full statements were withheld from networks and newspapers, any bin Laden associate in the United States could easily pick them up from foreign broadcast outlets or webcasts. More important, the American people should have unfettered access to information about the terrorist leader and his views. We trust the White House does not believe that his venomous propaganda will turn the country in his favor."
An administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said CIA analysts studying the broadcasts detected nothing specific but made a compelling enough argument about the risk of coded messages that the administration rushed to put President Bush's highest ranking national security official on the phone to TV executives.
The suspicion is based on hunch and common sense, a second administration official said, because bin Laden's language is filled with flowery, fuzzy images.
A third official noted that bin Laden and his spokesman both wore white turbans, the Muslims' traditional color of martyrdom, in the two tapes aired since U.S. military attacks began on Oct. 7. Bin Laden also wore combat fatigues.
"He wears a camouflage jacket to signify he's at war. There's nothing obscure about it," said retired CIA counterterrorism expert Vincent Cannistraro. "He wore that jacket when ABC interviewed him in 1998 and two months later the bombings in the east African embassies took place."
There is historical precedent in the West.
During World War II, for example, resistance forces inside Nazi-occupied France knew to listen for coded phrases in the speeches of Winston Churchill broadcast over the BBC.
At the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a news-media watchdog group, Matthew Felling called the administration's request "a silky form of censorship ... uncomfortable but understandable."
"Because bin Laden is resourceful, he would use our cultural tools as weapons, be they airplanes or airwaves," said Felling, the center's media director.
Ibrahim Hilal, chief editor of Al-Jazeera, scoffed at the notion of hidden signals and said the terrorists were sophisticated enough to communicate with each other directly. "I don't think the United States, who taught the world about freedom of expression, should now begin to limit it," Hilal said in an interview.
Bush designed his schedule today to take note of the one-month anniversary of the attacks, possibly to include a news conference where he would summarize his war against the terrorists and the Afghan Taliban militia that shelters them.
But the White House warning about al-Qaida broadcasts was the latest in a series of administration efforts to limit the flow of information.
Bush, angry about leaks to reporters last week, abruptly shut down classified briefings to all but eight members of Congress. He backed off yesterday, after Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., reminded the president that the State Department is required by law to keep House and Senate committees on foreign relations "fully and currently informed."
Sheik Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, emir of Qatar where Al-Jazeera is based, said last week when he was in Washington that Secretary of State Colin Powell complained to him about Al-Jazeera's repeated airing of bin Laden footage. The State Department also tried to block the government-funded Voice of America radio station from airing an interview with a Taliban official.
And last month, Fleischer publicly scolded the host of TV's "Politically Incorrect" talk show for controversial comments on the terrorist attacks and admonished all Americans "to watch what they say."
Washington asks Qatar to curb TV station's news coverage of attacks
Influential, independent Arab channel Al-Jazeera dismisses U.S. criticism, says its coverage is balanced.
News media, administration struggle over press freedom, national security
Analysis 'Patriotism and transparency are kissing cousins,' says free-press advocate; restraint, are close relatives too, government insists.
2 networks pass on showing bin Laden tape
Fox, MSNBC decide it’s not newsworthy; CNN airs brief portion.
Politically correct speech
By Ken Paulson This is clearly the wrong time to say the wrong thing.
Networks cautious in covering war
News execs heed White House warning to monitor bin Laden messages; meanwhile, ABC News chief apologizes for saying journalists shouldn't have an opinion about Pentagon attack.
FOI advocates fear government clampdown in response to attacks
Conference participants say officials have withheld some information and may set up more roadblocks.
Pentagon: U.S. troops in central Asia to remain off-limits to reporters
Military officials say they're willing to restrict press access to American soldiers if it means countries in region will cooperate militarily.
War on terrorism revives tension between press, government
Bush administration says ‘new type of war’ requires high degree of secrecy, but journalists worry officials are blocking access to too much information.
News media try to cover anthrax attacks fairly
NBC’s Brokaw shows anger on air; CNN says it has been approached about interviewing Osama bin Laden.
Open-government advocates see 'epidemic of official secrecy'
Analysis No White House can arbitrarily withhold information and expect to maintain public confidence, says Federation of American Scientists' Steven Aftergood.