FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM FORUM.ORG
Newseum First Amendment Newsroom Diversity
spacer
spacer
First Amendment Center
First Amendment Text
Columnists
Research Packages
First Amendment Publications

spacer
Today's News
Related links
Contact Us



spacer
spacer graphic

Schools must model democracy to teach it effectively

Inside the First Amendment

By Charles Haynes
Senior scholar, First Amendment Center

10.29.00

Printer-friendly page

Here's a frightening thought: The schools where we educate for democratic citizenship are often among the least democratic places in our society.

An urgent telephone call this week reminded me how disconnected our public schools can become from their civic mission. A New Jersey school board member called seeking advice on how to convince his fellow board members to distribute U.S. Department of Education guidelines on student religious expression in schools.

Apparently, a majority of the board opposes informing community members about the guidelines. Why? Because if parents and kids learn about their rights, they might decide to exercise them.

As absurd as this sounds, it's not hard to figure out why the board members and administrators are so skittish. They're responsible for maintaining safety and discipline in the schools at a time when the larger society is often unsafe and undisciplined. "Rights talk" alarms many school officials, especially when it's unaccompanied by any discussion of civic responsibility.

When religion is involved, the fear cuts even deeper. Because of our nation's long history of conflict over religion in public schools, board members don't want to do anything that might stir up trouble. The specter of kids forming religious clubs, handing out religious literature or otherwise exercising their rights in schools strikes many school officials as a harbinger of conflict and controversy.

In the face of all this, what's the best advice for that New Jersey school board? Answer: Hand out the guidelines. And train the teachers and administrators to implement them.

Is that risky? Sure. But the greater risk lies in not informing staff, students and parents of what is and isn't permissible under current law.

I can take you to scores of school districts that have been pro-active in disseminating information and developing clear, community-supported religious-liberty guidelines. Not only do these districts have far fewer lawsuits and conflicts, they also have parents' trust and support.

A district that keeps its head in the sand hoping to avoid conflict is a district that will soon land in court. Most of the current fights and lawsuits over religion in the schools are in communities where parents and students don't know the First Amendment guidelines and where teachers and administrators operate in the dark.

What if the New Jersey board doesn't buy this argument and persists in avoiding religious-liberty issues in their schools?

My colleague, religious-liberty attorney Oliver Thomas, offers a follow-up suggestion (with tongue firmly in cheek): If the board votes down the motion to inform kids and parents of their First Amendment rights, why not just delete the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights from the civics curriculum? That way, the district won't run the risk of kids learning about any of their constitutional rights. No fuss, no mess.

Putting this suggestion on the table might cue the board to the irony of teaching citizenship in the classroom while simultaneously ignoring the constitutional rights of students.

Fortunately, most school districts know the folly of ignoring the First Amendment. On the same day that I received the call from the concerned board member, Mr. Thomas and I were conducting a workshop on the religious-liberty guidelines for leaders from six Pennsylvania school districts located just over the state line from the previously noted New Jersey district.

No crisis precipitated this training. The Pennsylvania educators just wanted to find out what is legal and right before any conflict erupts.

As we told them, the consensus guidelines disseminated by the U.S. Department of Education are a good place to start. But much more must be done.

It isn't enough simply to inform students about their rights. One of public education's core missions is to teach students how to exercise their rights with responsibility. This can be done in a variety of ways, from involving students in the process of drafting class rules to "town meetings" where students are encouraged to discuss issues that arise in the school culture.

Nor is it sufficient to send moms and dads a list of guidelines. Parents should be involved in the process of developing policies and practices to implement the guidelines in the schools.

Why is this so important? Because public schools are laboratories for citizenship in our democracy. If we expect students to be responsible and committed citizens, then we must ensure that schools model the democratic first principles at the heart of the American experiment in liberty.

Your questions and comments are welcome. Write to:
Charles Haynes
The Freedom Forum First Amendment Center
1101 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22209

E-mail: chaynes@freedomforum.org

Recent Charles Haynes columns

More Charles Haynes columns

graphic
spacer