Bridget
Mergens
Bridget
Mergens wanted to start a Bible club at her high school. Her principal
told her the club couldn’t meet at school. So Bridget challenged his
ruling. The case — Westside Community Schools
v. Mergens (1990)
— went all the way to the Supreme Court. It established that the Equal
Access Act, signed into law in August 1984, was constitutional. Because
Bridget’s school allowed groups started and led by students to meet,
the Supreme Court said it must allow all such groups to meet, even
those whose focus was religious.
Bridget Mergens never thought of herself
as an activist. Active, yes. By the time she was a senior at Westside
High School, in Omaha, Nebraska, Bridget was an officer of the school
drama club and a member of the choir, and she was carrying a full
load of advanced placement classes. But she wasn’t the political
type. She had never been to a rally or demonstration. And all she
knew about America’s legal system was what she picked up watching
L.A. Law. She certainly never imagined that she could ignite
a legal battle that would land in the chambers of the Supreme Court
of the United States.
But
that’s just what happened … at the beginning of her senior year
in high school. Bridget’s legal odyssey began one morning when she
approached her homeroom teacher — “a close pal” — who was also Westside’s
principal. “I asked him if I could start an after-school Bible club,”
Bridget recalls.
Bridget
figured the principal, James Findlay, would be delighted to hear
that she and a group of her Christian friends wanted to stay after
school for a Bible-discussion group. “There are a lot of problems
with teenagers in Omaha,” Bridget explains. “There are drug gangs
here, the Crips and the Bloods from Los Angeles. Kids are getting
killed in malls and on the street. Drugs are all over the place.
It’s a really hard time for young people. I thought the school would
be happy that a bunch of students wanted to sit around after school
and talk about the Bible.”
Bridget
was wrong. “Dr. Findlay said that we absolutely could not meet,”
she remembers. “I was shocked.”
Findlay
didn’t object to Bridget’s basic idea of a Bible-discussion group.
He actually encouraged it. But he said he couldn’t allow her to
hold the meetings at school, even after hours. Findlay believed
that letting Bridget’s Bible group meet at school would be in direct
violation of U.S. laws forbidding the mixing of church and state
— or in this case, bringing religion into public schools.
Bridget
accepted Findlay’s decision at first. As a firm believer in religious
freedom, she’s strongly opposed to the idea of school prayer or
any other move that would require students to practice a religion
they don’t believe in. “If anyone ever told me I had to pray, she
says, “I’d tell them to take a jump. I also think it’s wrong for
parents to force their kids to go to church. Religion is something
that each person has to decide on their own.”
But as
Bridget mulled over her disappointment, she began to wonder whether
it was logical to compare her idea of a voluntary Bible club with
school prayer, in-class Bible reading, or any other mandatory religious
study. “Our Bible club wasn’t going to be adults telling students
they had to pray or read the Bible,” says Bridget. “It was just
students joining because they wanted to exchange ideas with each
other.”
…
“I really believed we were being treated unfairly,” says Bridget.
“We weren’t asking for special treatment. And if we wanted to do
something destructive, like sacrifice dogs or cats or mess up the
school I could understand it. But all we wanted to do was meet like
any other club.”
Although
not everyone in school agreed with Bridget, she found that both
her teachers and fellow students respected her decision to stand
up for what she believed. “Some of the younger punk-rocker types
would walk by me in the hall and say, ‘Hey, let’s go sacrifice a
cow after school,’ or ‘Let’s go worship Satan,’” Bridget recalls
with a laugh. “And some of my more liberal teachers called me ‘Fundy,’
for fundamentalist. But they were joking. And most people were really
supportive. My social-studies teachers thought it was the greatest
thing to talk about in class.”…
The Court’s
decision will no longer have any direct bearing on Bridget’s life.
She’s married now, attending college … and even has a new last name
— Mayhew.
But the
outcome of her case will affect virtually every public school in
America … Bridget says she’s proud to have started it all. “I have
a different name now,” she says. “So when people are talking about
the Mergens case, they won’t even know it’s me. But I’ll always
know.”
Excerpt
from “From High School to the High Court” by Lauren Tarshis, UPDATE,
January 26, 1990. Copyright 1990 by Scholastic, Inc. Reprinted by
permission of Scholastic, Inc.
BACK
|