|
Conclusion
Not only has the U.S. Supreme Court clamped down on student
rights, but students live in a time when there are numerous
efforts to protect them from supposedly harmful speech, such
as rap and rock music, violent video games and cyberporn.208
The difficult times public school students face are exacerbated
by fear of the Internet and the post-Columbine consciousness
of many public school administrators.209
These factors combine to allow the censorship of public school
students who offer critical, offensive commentary on their
own computers on their own websites.
The Internet offers an outlet for students who feel alienated
at school.210
The Internet may even afford officials an opportunity to examine
the potential dangerousness of certain disturbed students.211
The unparalleled educational opportunities of the Internet
are often subsumed by talk about the gloom and doom of cyberspace.
The First Amendment exists to allow people to offer dissenting
opinions. Students are citizens who should also enjoy the
protections of the Bill of Rights, particularly when they
are in the privacy of their own homes. We must be eternally
vigilant to ensure that our fear of new technology and paranoia
over school safety does not lead to a shedding of students'
constitutional rights not only at the schoolhouse gate, but
at their own computer.

|